Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@secretlab.ca
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c | 22 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
index 32eeabe..3d17ef6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@secretlab.ca
---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/ams-delta-fiq.c |8 --
arch/arm/mach-omap1/fpga.c | 28 +++---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c | 44 +-
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 39
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@secretlab.ca
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 93 ++---
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
index c05c653..1e83b6b 100644
--- a/arch
only) to execute on ARMv7, and the CPU hangs.
This patch is required for OMAP3 boards to boot.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 01:02:46PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Looks like this driver does not exist outside linux-omap tree,
care to send the whole driver to MTD list?
Unless someone created a big-endian OMAP,
Don't they use standard ARM ARM cores, which can all be used in both
LE and
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 01:26:38PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Looks like this driver does not exist outside linux-omap tree,
care to send the whole driver to MTD list?
Unless someone created a big-endian OMAP,
Don't they use standard ARM ARM cores, which can all be used in
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:23:35PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
The most visible BE-ARM seems to be Intel's IXP network processors.
The IXPs are one of the few cases where the vendors _ships an all-BE
software development environment by default_ -- but that doesn't mean
that BE doesn't work
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:37:34PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
I've never seen CPU endianity being hardwired in any ARM system ever
-- but maybe OMAP is different.
I'll let TI answer that one, since I'm not going to look at docs for
all the ARM's I've ever used.
My observation stands
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:45:19PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
The most visible BE-ARM seems to be Intel's IXP network processors.
The IXPs are one of the few cases where the vendors _ships an all-BE
software development environment by default_ -- but that doesn't mean
that BE
