On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 05:33 PM, Levi Pearson wrote:
>> I spent some more time looking at clk-twl6030.c, and it seems it just turns
>> the
>> twl6030 chip on when you ask it to enable the clock, and as far as I
>> can te
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/11/2013 09:58 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> IMHO the 'hack' in the twl-regulator should not have been removed before we
> provide proper support for the clocks via the common clock framework.
>
I was surprised that this happened in th
If for whatever reason the commits cannot be reverted, would creating
a driver like drivers/clk/clk-twl6040.c that enabled the twl6030's
clock output be a suitable alternative? I'd be willing to take a stab
at writing it if there's not something like that in the works alre