Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14): Revert staging: tidspbridge - update Kconfig to select IOMMU module Revert staging: tidspbridge - remove dmm custom module Revert staging: tidspbridge - deprecate reserve/unreserve_memory funtions

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14):       Revert staging: tidspbridge - update Kconfig to select IOMMU module       Revert staging: tidspbridge - remove dmm custom module       Revert

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 05:29:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14): Revert staging: tidspbridge - update Kconfig to select IOMMU module Revert staging: tidspbridge - remove dmm custom module Revert

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 05:29:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14):       Revert staging: tidspbridge - update Kconfig to select IOMMU module       Revert

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:04:18AM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 05:29:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14):       Revert

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com [101109 08:36]: tidspbridge iommu change are working fine all the patches and few fixes after that are alredy sent. what breaks tidspbridge, is the unmerged dependencies in linux omap tree, specifically the iommu module patches and the SG patch.

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:04:18AM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 05:29:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010,

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com [101109 08:36]: tidspbridge iommu change are working fine all the patches and few fixes after that are alredy sent. what breaks tidspbridge, is the unmerged dependencies in

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:04:18AM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Ramirez Luna, Omar
Hi, Seriously, I'm getting very confused here, and am very annoyed by the whole thing. Here's what I don't like:  - the original driver didn't even seem to work properly  - people sent me patches they never tested and broke things even worse  - some people have no respect for the omap

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com [101109 08:36]: tidspbridge iommu change are working fine all the patches and few fixes after

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: If it is easy to revert and push later, then the revert just this piece should be done now. Seriously, I'm getting very confused here, and am very annoyed by the whole thing. With good reason. Here's what I don't like:  - the

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: Felipe Contreras (14):       Revert staging: tidspbridge - update Kconfig to select IOMMU module       Revert staging: tidspbridge - remove dmm custom module       Revert

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:53:29PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: If it is easy to revert and push later, then the revert just this piece should be done now. Seriously, I'm getting very confused here, and am very annoyed by the

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com [101109 09:43]: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com [101109 08:36]: tidspbridge iommu change

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-09 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:53:29PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: You mean after this pull, or should Omar re-send this pull request? I'm not pulling _anything_ at the moment for this driver. I want to see patches, not a pull

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-08 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: The situation of tidspbridge driver on staging has been pretty sad, basically, it has never worked. This is a step backwards from the previous situation where it was clear which branch to use to get it working.

Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com [101108 14:51]: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: The situation of tidspbridge driver on staging has been pretty sad, basically, it has never worked. This is a step backwards from the previous

[GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1

2010-11-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi Greg, The situation of tidspbridge driver on staging has been pretty sad, basically, it has never worked. This is a step backwards from the previous situation where it was clear which branch to use to get it working. Unfortunately, the ARM and OMAP trees haven't made it easy, as changes in