On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:33:47PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 13:54]:
Thanks, merged that into the series. The updated OMAP patch updated is
below, which has been moved to part 2. Lastly, the final patch of part
2 has been updated
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [11 07:42]:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:33:47PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 13:54]:
Thanks, merged that into the series. The updated OMAP patch updated is
below, which has been
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk,
there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers.
Add mach-omap1/common.h and mach-omap2/common.h and move the
local prototypes there from plat/common.h and mach/omap4-common.h.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:17:19PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk,
there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers.
Add mach-omap1/common.h and mach-omap2/common.h and move the
local prototypes there from
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 11:49]:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:17:19PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk,
there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers.
Add mach-omap1/common.h and
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 01:50:09PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 11:49]:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:17:19PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk,
there's no need to keep local
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 13:54]:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 01:50:09PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [10 11:49]:
OK, a stable branch is needed badly for this.. If possible please
publish some minimal stable
