If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
file), then the compiler will generate redefintion errors for the macros
in soc.h. Prevent this by only allowing the content in soc.h to be
included once.
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
file), then the compiler will generate redefintion errors for the macros
in soc.h. Prevent this by only
On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
file), then the compiler will generate redefintion errors
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:31]:
On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
On 11/09/2012 03:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:31]:
On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
once directly by the source file
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 15:44]:
On 11/09/2012 03:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:31]:
On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header soc.h is included more than once in a
On 11/09/2012 05:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 15:44]:
On 11/09/2012 03:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:31]:
On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 08:21]:
If the header
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 15:59]:
Sorry, I meant in the fixes series I have posted for dmtimer, I am
adding a new function called omap_dm_timer_populate_errata() that is
using cpu_is_() [1]. I had done this a while back, but now I see
that we want to get away from doing that
On 11/09/2012 06:21 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [121109 15:59]:
Sorry, I meant in the fixes series I have posted for dmtimer, I am
adding a new function called omap_dm_timer_populate_errata() that is
using cpu_is_() [1]. I had done this a while back, but now I
