Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_boot_secondary':
:(.text+0x8a70):
* Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org [140313 11:30]:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap4_boot_secondary':
:(.text+0x8a70): undefined reference to `pm44xx_errata'
On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function
On 03/12/2014 04:59 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build
failure complaining about the following:
On Thursday 13 March 2014 06:07 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 03/12/2014 04:59 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 13 March 2014 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Just like IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM, IS_PM44XX_ERRATUM is valid only if
CONFIG_PM is enabled, else, disabling CONFIG_PM results in build