Palande
Cc: linux-omap; Ramirez Luna, Omar; Menon, Nishanth
Subject: RE: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix to avoid possible recursive locking
Hi Ameya,
Yes I agree with your comments.
As I understand NTFY_Notify() is called again inside WMD_MSG_Get() to make sure
that notification is done in case if message
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:57 PM
To: Chitriki Rudramuni, Deepak
Cc: linux-omap; Ramirez Luna, Omar; Menon, Nishanth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Fix to avoid possible recursive locking
Hi Deepak,
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 02:01 +0100, ext Deepak Chitriki wrote:
> This patch fixes
Hi Deepak,
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 02:01 +0100, ext Deepak Chitriki wrote:
> This patch fixes possible recursive locking detection.The implementation
> in which the spinlock is acquired and released is rectified in WMD_MSG_Get()
> to avoid locking contention.
> Added SYNC_EnterCS() and SYNC_LeaveCS(
This patch fixes possible recursive locking detection.The implementation
in which the spinlock is acquired and released is rectified in WMD_MSG_Get()
to avoid locking contention.
Added SYNC_EnterCS() and SYNC_LeaveCS()in WMD_MSG_Get()function.
Cc: Ameya Palande
Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna
Cc: Nishanth
