* Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080318 05:39]:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:56:10PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > The IRQ handler in omap-i2c.c can sometimes clear status bits without
> > actually processing them. In particular, error status bits will be
> > ignored if any of the ARDY, RRDY,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:56:10PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> The IRQ handler in omap-i2c.c can sometimes clear status bits without
> actually processing them. In particular, error status bits will be
> ignored if any of the ARDY, RRDY, RDR, XRDY, or XDR bits are
> concurrently set.
Are there a
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 01:14:32PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > - int count = 0;
> > + int err, count = 0;
>
> int err = 0, count = 0; will be better and you avoid that err=0 before
> using err right below.
No, the err = 0 I added is in a while loop. It needs to be
reinitialized for each i
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:56:10 -0500, Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The IRQ handler in omap-i2c.c can sometimes clear status bits without
> actually processing them. In particular, error status bits will be
> ignored if any of the ARDY, RRDY, RDR, XRDY, or XDR bits are
> concurrently s
The IRQ handler in omap-i2c.c can sometimes clear status bits without
actually processing them. In particular, error status bits will be
ignored if any of the ARDY, RRDY, RDR, XRDY, or XDR bits are
concurrently set.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
More information:
I origina
