On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 04:52:03PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
I guess you're talking about 8cc4af26d1e2b01cd9dc2c5e6b166d08946bc2e6
that I just pushed?
Precisely.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let's keep linux-usb on the loop for musb related patches ;-)
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:53:56AM +0300, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is no check if platform code passes in more endpoints (num_eps)
than the maximum number of enpoints (MUSB_C_NUM_EPS.) The result is
that allocate_instance()
Felipe Balbi wrote:
Let's keep linux-usb on the loop for musb related patches ;-)
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:53:56AM +0300, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is no check if platform code passes in more endpoints (num_eps)
than the maximum number of enpoints (MUSB_C_NUM_EPS.) The result is
that
* Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080910 04:27]:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:20:35PM +0300, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi wrote:
Let's keep linux-usb on the loop for musb related patches ;-)
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:53:56AM +0300, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
There is no check if
