Op 21 jun 2010, om 23:31 heeft Zygo Blaxell het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:34:33PM +0300, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>> (CC Tomi)
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Zygo Blaxell
>> wrote:
>>> The TRM and the OMAP FB driver have different ideas about the widths
>>> of v
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, ext Zygo Blaxell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:34:33PM +0300, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
(CC Tomi)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Zygo Blaxell
wrote:
The TRM and the OMAP FB driver have different ideas about the widths
of various bit fields in the DISPC_TIMING_{H,V
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:34:33PM +0300, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> (CC Tomi)
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Zygo Blaxell
> wrote:
> > The TRM and the OMAP FB driver have different ideas about the widths
> > of various bit fields in the DISPC_TIMING_{H,V} registers. This patch
> > is bas
(CC Tomi)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Zygo Blaxell
wrote:
> The TRM and the OMAP FB driver have different ideas about the widths
> of various bit fields in the DISPC_TIMING_{H,V} registers. This patch
> is based on what the TRM (TI document SPRUF98G) says.
>
> Note: this patch changes the
The TRM and the OMAP FB driver have different ideas about the widths
of various bit fields in the DISPC_TIMING_{H,V} registers. This patch
is based on what the TRM (TI document SPRUF98G) says.
Note: this patch changes the meanings of the vertical timing values
by one scan line. It still works w
