Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2013-02-05 Thread Kevin Hilman
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes: On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:05:53 +1100, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:57:07 -0700 Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote: OK thanks, I'll queue this up for v3.6-rc as this should qualify as a regression. I

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-12-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:05:53 +1100, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:57:07 -0700 Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote: OK thanks, I'll queue this up for v3.6-rc as this should qualify as a regression. I don't think this did actually get queued. At least

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-12-14 Thread anish kumar
...@suse.de Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:09:06 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event an any active GPIO event if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. Should it read this way Current kernel will wake from suspend

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-12-13 Thread NeilBrown
] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event an any active GPIO event if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set: 1/ while non-suspended the CPU might go into a deep sleep

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-10 Thread NeilBrown
be surprised if there is some case that it doesn't handle quite right, but it seems right to me. Thanks, NeilBrown From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-10 Thread Kevin Hilman
case that it doesn't handle quite right, but it seems right to me. Thanks, NeilBrown From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-10 Thread Kevin Hilman
- don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event an any active GPIO event if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set: 1/ while non-suspended the CPU might go into a deep sleep (off_mode

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-09 Thread NeilBrown
that it doesn't handle quite right, but it seems right to me. Thanks, NeilBrown From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-08 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
to me. Thanks, NeilBrown From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-07 Thread Kevin Hilman
GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set: 1/ while non-suspended the CPU might go into a deep sleep

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-06 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:18:09 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:35 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:59:06 -0700 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-06 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:57:46 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:18:09 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:35 AM, NeilBrown

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-06 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:21 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:57:46 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:18:09 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-06 Thread Felipe Balbi
From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set: 1

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-06 Thread Shubhrajyoti
On Thursday 06 September 2012 12:32 PM, NeilBrown wrote: From: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested. Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-05 Thread NeilBrown
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:59:06 -0700 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:53 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:47:50 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-05 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:35 AM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:59:06 -0700 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:53 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-09-03 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:53 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:47:50 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: + Jon, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:14 PM, NeilBrown

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-08-26 Thread NeilBrown
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:47:50 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: + Jon, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:14 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-08-26 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:53 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:47:50 +0530 Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: + Jon, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:14 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on

Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.

2012-08-25 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
+ Jon, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:14 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event on any active GPIO even if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called. There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set: 1/ while non-suspended the CPU might