On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:30 PM, stanley.miao wrote:
> Cliff Brake wrote:
>>
>> Functionally, what does this statement mean? The 3503 seems to have
>> the EN_IO [8] bit, but I've yet to figure out what the EN_IO_CHAIN
>> [16] means.
>>
>
> Please reference to Chapter 4.11 PRCM Off-Mode Management
Cliff Brake wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
"Stanley.Miao" writes:
First, the subject needs to be more descriptive:
OMAP3: AM3505/3517 do not have IO wakeup capability
Functionally, what does this statement mean? The 3503 seems to have
the EN_IO [8] bi
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> "Stanley.Miao" writes:
>
> First, the subject needs to be more descriptive:
>
> OMAP3: AM3505/3517 do not have IO wakeup capability
Functionally, what does this statement mean? The 3503 seems to have
the EN_IO [8] bit, but I've yet to figu
"Stanley.Miao" writes:
First, the subject needs to be more descriptive:
OMAP3: AM3505/3517 do not have IO wakeup capability
> omap3505/omap3517 don't have the bit OMAP3430_EN_IO and the bit
> OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN in the register PM_WKEN_WKUP. When the system
> suspend, the following messages wi
omap3505/omap3517 don't have the bit OMAP3430_EN_IO and the bit
OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN in the register PM_WKEN_WKUP. When the system
suspend, the following messages will be printed:
"Wake up daisy chain activation failed."
Now fix it by adding "if (!cpu_is_omap3505() && !cpu_is_omap3517())".
Signe
