Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-18 Thread Kalle Valo
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:20:24PM +0400, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: Tony Lindgren wrote: Anything touching arch/arm/*omap*. I'm not sure how many non-omap based boards out there are using twl4030 chip and if a separate mfd mail list

[PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Amit Kucheria
Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. Compile-tested only. Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@verdurent.com --- include/linux/i2c/twl4030.h | 78 +++--- 1 files changed, 6

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Felipe Balbi
on subject put REMOVE_OMAP_LEGACY_CODE like all the other related patches so it's easier to track down which features we're loosing :-p -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com [090617 04:43]: on subject put REMOVE_OMAP_LEGACY_CODE like all the other related patches so it's easier to track down which features we're loosing :-p I actually have similar patches here already for all the I2C stuff and the remaining twl4030 stuff..

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Eugeny S. Mints
Amit Kucheria wrote: Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. development against upstream is great. But what will be left for this mail list if we send all patches directly to lkml? Eugeny -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Eugeny S. Mints eugeny.mi...@gmail.com [090617 06:46]: Amit Kucheria wrote: Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. development against upstream is great. But what will be left for this mail list if we send all

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 09 Jun 17, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: Amit Kucheria wrote: Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. development against upstream is great. But what will be left for this mail list if we send all patches directly to

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Eugeny S. Mints
Tony Lindgren wrote: * Eugeny S. Mints eugeny.mi...@gmail.com [090617 06:46]: Amit Kucheria wrote: Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. development against upstream is great. But what will be left

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@verdurent.com [090617 07:19]: On 09 Jun 17, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: Amit Kucheria wrote: Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power functionality will follow directly to lkml. development against upstream is great. But what

Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: Reset header file to mainline

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:20:24PM +0400, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: Tony Lindgren wrote: Anything touching arch/arm/*omap*. I'm not sure how many non-omap based boards out there are using twl4030 chip and if a separate mfd mail list exists. But until any of the above is true I personally