Hi!
You can do without ret variable... Also more detailed changelog would
be nice... like what exact problem this works around.
Sure i can, but I don't see a reason to ignore SM's return value. Changelog
of what?
I guess if you read the thread over the ML you'll have your questions
Hi!
+u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
+u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
+{
+ u32 ret;
+ u32 param[5];
+
+ param[0] = nargs+1;
+ param[1] = arg1;
+ param[2] = arg2;
+ param[3] = arg3;
+ param[4] = arg4;
Hi,
Оригинално писмо
От: Pavel Machek
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 30 20:36:54 EET
Hi!
+u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32
arg2
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is
* Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg [130327 22:34]:
Tony,
Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically
merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting
#ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
implementations. So the handler and passing of the
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130327 14:09]:
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
the code will still work on
the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how
to proceed.
Regards,
Ivo
Оригинално писмо
От: Tony Lindgren
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Сряда
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 20:13:15 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at
Оригинално писмо
От: Aaro Koskinen
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Ивайло Димитров
Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 2 01:51:39 EET
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
Unfortunately
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
first major difference is here (code taken from
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major
difference is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
ENTRY(omap_smc2)
stmfd sp!, {r4-r12,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
Оригинално писмо
От: Peter De Schrijver
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Петък, 2013, Март 1 11:43:14 EET
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major difference
is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
ENTRY(omap_smc2)
stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
mov r3, r2
mov r2,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
You sure? I think you need to explain this more - the commit message in
the original patch is empty/missing...
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36 +
On 10:42-20130228, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
+++
to test if the code still
works if I make changes to omap2-secure.c/omap-smc.S :)
Оригинално писмо
От: Nishanth Menon
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Четвъртък, 2013, Февруари 28 16:40:05 EET
On 10:42
22 matches
Mail list logo