Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> OK, but that doesn't mean you have to keep sending it. It just means
> Tony's fixes branch isn't in -next (yet.)
I do not care about which one is merged, but don't want to apply
the fix patch manually for each test, :-)
In fact, there
Ming Lei writes:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> tom.leim...@gmail.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Ming Lei
>>>
>>> The patch fixes the compile failure:
>>>
>>> CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c:317:12: error: 'THIS_MODULE'
>>> u
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> tom.leim...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> From: Ming Lei
>>
>> The patch fixes the compile failure:
>>
>> CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c:317:12: error: 'THIS_MODULE'
>> undeclared here (not in a
tom.leim...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Ming Lei
>
> The patch fixes the compile failure:
>
> CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c:317:12: error: 'THIS_MODULE'
> undeclared here (not in a function)
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o] Error 1
From: Ming Lei
The patch fixes the compile failure:
CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c:317:12: error: 'THIS_MODULE'
undeclared here (not in a function)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2
make
