* Javier Martinez Canillas [150805 05:47]:
> Hello Tomeu,
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> wrote:
> > ...if there isn't one already.
> >
>
> I think is better to instead splitting the subject line like this, to
> change it for something that fits like "memory: omap-gpmc: Don'
On 05/08/15 15:24, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> ...if there isn't one already.
>
> If for some reason the GPMC device hasn't been probed yet, gpmc_base is
> going to be NULL. Because there's no context yet to be saved, just turn
> these functions into no-ops until that device gets probed.
>
> Unable to
Hello Tomeu,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> ...if there isn't one already.
>
I think is better to instead splitting the subject line like this, to
change it for something that fits like "memory: omap-gpmc: Don't try
to save uninitialized GPMC context" or "memory: omap-gpm
...if there isn't one already.
If for some reason the GPMC device hasn't been probed yet, gpmc_base is
going to be NULL. Because there's no context yet to be saved, just turn
these functions into no-ops until that device gets probed.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual add
