On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 09/01/2014 04:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add support for the optional second
On 09/01/2014 04:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
events. And then SoC can wakeup and handle the event using it's
regular
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
events. And then SoC can wakeup
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
events. And then SoC can wakeup and handle the event using it's
regular handler.
Finally, to pass the wake-up interrupt in