> -Original Message-
> From: Hilman, Kevin
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: pm: Downgrade WARN for no wakeup source
>
>
"Premi, Sanjeev" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hilman, Kevin
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:52 PM
>> To: Premi, Sanjeev
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: pm:
> -Original Message-
> From: Hilman, Kevin
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:52 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: pm: Downgrade WARN for no wakeup source
>
> Hi Sanjeev,
&g
Hi Sanjeev,
Sanjeev Premi writes:
> When multiple wakeup sources are defined in a system,
> there is a small window, when more than one source
> can trigger wakeup interrupt.
>
> In the current implementation, the do-while() loop
> can handle all wakeup sources that are recorded when
> probing t
When multiple wakeup sources are defined in a system,
there is a small window, when more than one source
can trigger wakeup interrupt.
In the current implementation, the do-while() loop
can handle all wakeup sources that are recorded when
probing the status register in prcm_interrupt_handler().
W
