On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:23:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:16:43AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:00:44AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > The previous driver for bq27x00 batteries was a real
> > > ifdef mess. The following patches separ
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:16:43AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:00:44AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > The previous driver for bq27x00 batteries was a real
> > ifdef mess. The following patches separate common code
> > and create separate drivers for bq27200 and bq2700
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:00:44AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> The previous driver for bq27x00 batteries was a real
> ifdef mess. The following patches separate common code
> and create separate drivers for bq27200 and bq27000.
FYI (if you don't know already): Rodolfo Giometti already
cleaned up
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 01:40:06AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> One thing though: we can't delete the old driver now. I'm about
> to send a pull request to Linus. Though I think we can hurry up and
> merge the new driver for 2.6.28, but delete the old one in 2.6.29.
>
> This means that you migh
Hi Felipe,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:00:44AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> The previous driver for bq27x00 batteries was a real
> ifdef mess. The following patches separate common code
> and create separate drivers for bq27200 and bq27000.
>
> The code looks much cleaner, but we had to keep a glo
The previous driver for bq27x00 batteries was a real
ifdef mess. The following patches separate common code
and create separate drivers for bq27200 and bq27000.
The code looks much cleaner, but we had to keep a global
static pointer to hold the i2c_client (bq27200) or the
w1 device (bq27000).
If
