Hi Omar,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna
omar.rami...@copitl.com wrote:
Yes, I made the changes, for tidspbridge and remoteproc, I will submit
both for review, based on this series.
Great, thanks.
Please note that when we do eventually merge this, we need your
updates to be
On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johanssono...@lixom.net wrote:
While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
reduce dependencies a little? Either way
Hi Loic/Ohad,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Loic PALLARDY loic.palla...@st.com wrote:
On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johanssono...@lixom.net wrote:
While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
remoteproc for omap
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
loic.pallardy-...@stericsson.com wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
with some coprocessors.
Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox.
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [121220 10:19]:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
loic.pallardy-...@stericsson.com wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
with some coprocessors.
Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [121220 10:19]:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
loic.pallardy-...@stericsson.com wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
with
* Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net [121220 11:22]:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [121220 10:19]:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
loic.pallardy-...@stericsson.com wrote:
OMAP and ST-Ericsson
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
reduce dependencies a little? Either way works, but it'd be nice to
keep them
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
with some coprocessors.
Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox.
This series:
- moves omap-mailbox framework to a newly drivers/mailbox folder
(part of
