Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state

2011-08-11 Thread Jean Pihet
Hi Todd, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote: ... All min_latency != PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE paths need

Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state

2011-07-29 Thread Todd Poynor
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0200, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: ... +int pwrdm_set_wkup_lat_constraint(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, void *cookie, + long min_latency) +{ + struct pwrdm_wkup_constraints_entry *user = NULL; + struct

Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state

2011-07-29 Thread Jean Pihet
Todd, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0200, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: ... +int pwrdm_set_wkup_lat_constraint(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, void *cookie, +                               long min_latency) +{ +  

Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state

2011-07-29 Thread Todd Poynor
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Todd Poynor toddpoy...@google.com wrote: ... All min_latency != PM_QOS_DEV_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE paths need free_new_user = 1. free_new_user = 1 is only needed if no existing constraint has been found,

[PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state

2011-07-28 Thread jean . pihet
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com When a PM QoS device latency constraint is requested or removed the PM QoS layer notifies the underlying layer with the updated aggregated constraint value. The constraint is stored in the powerdomain constraints list and then applied to the corresponding power