Currently sched.h and wait.h have circular dependency between both.
wait.h defines macros wake_up*() which use macros TASK_* defined by
sched.h. But as sched.h indirectly includes wait.h, such wait.h header
file can't include sched.h too. The side effect is when some file
includes wait.h and tries
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:20 PM, David Cohen daco...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently sched.h and wait.h have circular dependency between both.
wait.h defines macros wake_up*() which use macros TASK_* defined by
sched.h. But as sched.h indirectly includes wait.h, such wait.h header
file can't
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:20 PM, David Cohen daco...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently sched.h and wait.h have circular dependency between both.
wait.h defines macros wake_up*() which use macros TASK_* defined by
sched.h.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:20 PM, David Cohen daco...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently sched.h and wait.h have circular dependency between both.
wait.h defines macros wake_up*() which use macros TASK_* defined by
sched.h. But as
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Just include linux/sched.h in your driver.
This include splitting in small pieces is troublesome as well.
so, simply to call wake_up*() we need to know
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
I rather have the split done and kill the circular dependency.
It's not circular for starters.
how come ? wait.h depends on sched and sched.h depends on wait.h
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
I rather have the split done and kill the circular dependency.
It's not circular for starters.
how come ? wait.h depends on sched and sched.h depends on
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:05:14PM +0200, David Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
I rather have the split done and kill the circular dependency.
It's not circular
