* Péter Ujfalusi [04 02:00]:
> On Thursday 03 November 2011 14:27:56 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Should these tests be done only after the errata re-read for both
> > src and dst patches? Otherwise the errata will not be handled?
>
> Yes that might be a good idea.
> I was trying to locate t
On Thursday 03 November 2011 14:27:56 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Ujfalusi [111031 06:46]:
> > If the DMA source position has been asked before the
> > first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
> > register does not contain valid information.
> > We can identify this situation by check
* Tony Lindgren [03 13:53]:
> * Peter Ujfalusi [111031 06:46]:
> > If the DMA source position has been asked before the
> > first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
> > register does not contain valid information.
> > We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
> > register:
* Peter Ujfalusi [111031 06:46]:
> If the DMA source position has been asked before the
> first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
> register does not contain valid information.
> We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
> register:
> CDAC != 0 indicates that the DMA transfer
If the DMA source position has been asked before the
first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
register does not contain valid information.
We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
register:
CDAC != 0 indicates that the DMA transfer on the channel has
been started already.
When
