Hi Ranjith,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Ranjith Lohithakshan wrote:
> On Sat, 06-Feb-10 1:46 AM +0530, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > I had to make some changes to this patch for it to apply after the recent
> > clock split patches. Could you please check this patch and make sure it
> > is okay?
>
> It
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 06-Feb-10 1:46 AM +0530, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Ranjith,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Ranjith Lohithakshan wrote:
>
>> Current implementation defines clock idle state indicators based on the
>> cpu information (cpu_is_omap24xx() or cpu_is_omap34xx()) in a system wide
>> manner. T
Hi Ranjith,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Ranjith Lohithakshan wrote:
> Current implementation defines clock idle state indicators based on the
> cpu information (cpu_is_omap24xx() or cpu_is_omap34xx()) in a system wide
> manner. This patch extends the find_idlest() function in clkops to pass
> back the i
Current implementation defines clock idle state indicators based on the
cpu information (cpu_is_omap24xx() or cpu_is_omap34xx()) in a system wide
manner. This patch extends the find_idlest() function in clkops to pass
back the idle state indicator for that clock, thus allowing idle state
indicators
