2010/9/7 Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
>
> Ming Lei wrote:
>
>>> Which codebase is this patch meant for?
>>> I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
>
>>> Are there any patches which this one depends on?
>
>> This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
>> http://marc.info/?l
Hello.
Ming Lei wrote:
Which codebase is this patch meant for?
I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
Are there any patches which this one depends on?
This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128076716001885&w=2
http
2010/9/6 Gadiyar, Anand :
> Hi Tom,
>
> Which codebase is this patch meant for?
> I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
>
> Are there any patches which this one depends on?
This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128076716001885&w=2
tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> From: Ming Lei
>
> This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
>
> -the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
> for dma mode 0
>
> Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
> configure musb as g_zero
2010/8/27 Gadiyar, Anand :
> tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Ming Lei
>>
>> This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
>>
>> -the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
>> for dma mode 0
>>
>> Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed
tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> From: Ming Lei
>
> This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
>
> -the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
> for dma mode 0
>
> Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
> configure musb as g_zero
From: Ming Lei
This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
-the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
for dma mode 0
Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
configure musb as g_zero and use fifo mode 3 to enable double
buffer mode.
