On 10:17-20130312, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> > OK. My intent is to remove omap-cpufreq.c. So, I guess I could do
> > something like the following (not tested yet), but would that be the
> > right approach?
>
> Similar attempt was done for am33xx_clks in this by Shawn:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/li
Guo; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> o...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: support for clock which
> are not in DT yet.
>
> On 15:24-20130312, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > On
On 15:24-20130312, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On 03/12/2013 06:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
> >> is not complete. In short, the ability to:
> >> cpus {
>
Hi Guys,
On 03/12/2013 06:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
>> is not complete. In short, the ability to:
>> cpus {
>> cpu@0 {
>> clocks = <&cpuclk 0>;
>> };
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:05:29PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
> is not complete. In short, the ability to:
> cpus {
> cpu@0 {
> clocks = <&cpuclk 0>;
> };
> };
> is not possible. However, the clock node is register
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
> is not complete. In short, the ability to:
> cpus {
> cpu@0 {
> clocks = <&cpuclk 0>;
> };
> };
> is not possible. However, the clock node is registered.
> A
On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
is not complete. In short, the ability to:
cpus {
cpu@0 {
clocks = <&cpuclk 0>;
};
};
is not possible. However, the clock node is registered.
Allow for clk names to be provided as string so as to be used when needed.