* vimal singh [090504 22:52]:
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * vimal singh [090503 22:36]:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> > * Tony Lindgren [090430 11:56]:
> >> >> * Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
> >> >> > * vimal si
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * vimal singh [090503 22:36]:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> > * Tony Lindgren [090430 11:56]:
>> >> * Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
>> >> > * vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
>> >> > > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is
* vimal singh [090503 22:36]:
>
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren [090430 11:56]:
> >> * Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
> >> > * vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
> >> > > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
> >> > > all
Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
* vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
all boards anyway.
Why do you think this cannot be used for all boards?
The GPMC timings are totally based on the onenand chip features.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [090430 11:56]:
>> * Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
>> > * vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
>> > > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
>> > > all boards anyway.
>> >
>> > Why do you think this
* Tony Lindgren [090430 11:56]:
> * Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
> > * vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
> > > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
> > > all boards anyway.
> >
> > Why do you think this cannot be used for all boards?
> >
> > The GPMC timings are to
* Tony Lindgren [090430 07:06]:
> * vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
> > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
> > all boards anyway.
>
> Why do you think this cannot be used for all boards?
>
> The GPMC timings are totally based on the onenand chip features.
And th
* vimal singh [090429 23:33]:
> 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
> all boards anyway.
Why do you think this cannot be used for all boards?
The GPMC timings are totally based on the onenand chip features.
Regards,
Tony
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:20 AM,
'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in
all boards anyway.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Rename board-n800-flash.c to gpmc-onenand.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |4 ++--
> arch/arm
Rename board-n800-flash.c to gpmc-onenand.c.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |0
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{board-n800-flash.c => gpmc-onenand.c} (1
10 matches
Mail list logo