On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:59:43PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> -#ifndef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
> static void broadcast_timer_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> struct clock_event_device *evt)
> {
> }
>
> -static void local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> +static void
ussell King; David Brown;
> Daniel Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm;
> Colin Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummy timer
> support runtime
>
> The current code support of dummy t
Let's try this again from the correct email address...
On Sat, Feb 12 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> The current code support of dummy timers in absence of local
> timer is compile time. This is an attempt to convert it to runtime
> so that on few SOC version if the local timers aren't supporte
On Sat, Feb 12 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> The current code support of dummy timers in absence of local
> timer is compile time. This is an attempt to convert it to runtime
> so that on few SOC version if the local timers aren't supported
> kernel can switch to dummy timers. OMAP4430 ES1.0 do
The current code support of dummy timers in absence of local
timer is compile time. This is an attempt to convert it to runtime
so that on few SOC version if the local timers aren't supported
kernel can switch to dummy timers. OMAP4430 ES1.0 does suffer from
this limitation.
This patch should not
