* Ben Dooks [081216 14:07]:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:59:59PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > From: Paul Walmsley
> > >
> > > i2c-omap discriminates only between "revision 1" or "greater than
> > > revision 1." A following patc
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:59:59PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > From: Paul Walmsley
> >
> > i2c-omap discriminates only between "revision 1" or "greater than
> > revision 1." A following patch introduces code that must also
> > disc
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> From: Paul Walmsley
>
> i2c-omap discriminates only between "revision 1" or "greater than
> revision 1." A following patch introduces code that must also
> discriminate between rev2.x, rev3.6, and rev3.12 controllers. Support
> th
From: Paul Walmsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i2c-omap discriminates only between "revision 1" or "greater than
revision 1." A following patch introduces code that must also
discriminate between rev2.x, rev3.6, and rev3.12 controllers. Support
this by storing the full revision data from the I2C_REV re
From: Paul Walmsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i2c-omap discriminates only between "revision 1" or "greater than
revision 1." A following patch introduces code that must also
discriminate between rev2.x, rev3.6, and rev3.12 controllers. Support
this by storing the full revision data from the I2C_REV re
