* R, Sricharan [120507 07:12]:
> Hi Benoit,
> Thanks for the reviews.
>
> >
> >> Adding the minimal support for OMAP5 soc with device tree.
> >
> >
> > You should probably split that patch since you are doing several things that
> > are not OMAP5 related.
> >
> > Do a patch that move the omap_i
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for the reviews.
>
>> Adding the minimal support for OMAP5 soc with device tree.
>
>
> You should probably split that patch since you are doing several things that
> are not OMAP5 related.
>
> Do a patch that move the omap_init_irq into the INTC and GIC code first.
>
> Then, yo
Hi Sricharan,
On 5/3/2012 9:26 AM, R Sricharan wrote:
Adding the minimal support for OMAP5 soc with device tree.
You should probably split that patch since you are doing several things
that are not OMAP5 related.
Do a patch that move the omap_init_irq into the INTC and GIC code first.
Then
Adding the minimal support for OMAP5 soc with device tree.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 39 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h|2 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c | 11 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-c
