Hi Russ, Mark,
On 03/22/12 20:29, Russ Dill wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Mark Brown
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:19:54PM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
>>
>>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply dummy_supplies[] = {
>>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vddvario", "smsc911x.0"),
>>> +
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:19:54PM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
>
>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply dummy_supplies[] = {
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vddvario", "smsc911x.0"),
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdd33a", "smsc911x.0"),
>
> Why do none
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:19:54PM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply dummy_supplies[] = {
> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vddvario", "smsc911x.0"),
> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdd33a", "smsc911x.0"),
Why do none of these boards use -1 as the ID for the device?
signature
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-debugboard.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-debugboard.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-debugboard.c
index 369c2eb..f68b616 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-om
