Ghongdemath, Girish giris...@ti.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Pandita, Vikram vikram.pand...@ti.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Girish S G giris...@ti.com wrote:
snip
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
index
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Girish S G giris...@ti.com wrote:
snip
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
index 04b7770..46f6800 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
@@ -560,6 +560,9
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Pandita, Vikram vikram.pand...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Girish S G giris...@ti.com wrote:
snip
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
index 04b7770..46f6800 100644
---
As of now, the unused regulators are not getting disabled. Only those
regulators are disabled which are properly handled by drivers.
Calling regulator_has_full_constraints() will cause the regulator
core to disable all regulators which have a zero use count and don't
have always_on=true specified
