Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Ruslan Bilovol
> wrote:
> > The original issue with powering on the PHY (and using
> > 200 ms delay after this) is not related to internal
> > processes in the PHY but is in the incorrec
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> The original issue with powering on the PHY (and using
> 200 ms delay after this) is not related to internal
> processes in the PHY but is in the incorrect charger
> detection feature usage.
>
> Now when it is fixed, we can safely remove
The original issue with powering on the PHY (and using
200 ms delay after this) is not related to internal
processes in the PHY but is in the incorrect charger
detection feature usage.
Now when it is fixed, we can safely remove this uggly
mdelay that sometimes was called in atomic context and
lead
