Re: [PATCH 2/8] PRCM: Workaround for pwrdn_x control

2008-06-24 Thread Högander Jouni
"ext Paul Walmsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Jouni, > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Jouni Hogander wrote: > >> Clock path should be powered down only after all it's clients are >> properly disabled. Generally we don't have working implementation for >> checking wether some clock is enabled or

Re: [PATCH 2/8] PRCM: Workaround for pwrdn_x control

2008-06-24 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hello Jouni, On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Jouni Hogander wrote: > Clock path should be powered down only after all it's clients are > properly disabled. Generally we don't have working implementation for > checking wether some clock is enabled or disabled. Just wanted to revisit this again briefly. Is

[PATCH 2/8] PRCM: Workaround for pwrdn_x control

2008-06-17 Thread Jouni Hogander
Clock path should be powered down only after all it's clients are properly disabled. Generally we don't have working implementation for checking wether some clock is enabled or disabled. Signed-off-by: Jouni Hogander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 11 ++- 1 files