On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:52 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
> file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
> patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a12cc82bf982f518e, where only
> the dev_name was suppos
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 15:56 +0530, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
> > As I said, I don't know much about the OMAP MMC subsystem and I
> don't
> > have the time right now to investigate what really is wrong. That's
> why
> > I sent this patch, as quick fix (or rather getting rid of a
> regression).
>
> I
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:46 +0530, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>> > The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
>> > file seems to have been mistakenly reorderde
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:18 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 4/1/2011 8:52 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> > The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
> > file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
> > patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a1
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:46 +0530, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
> > file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
> > patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe4
On 4/1/2011 8:52 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a12cc82bf982f518e, where only
the dev_name was supposed to be changed, t
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
> file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
> patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a12cc82bf982f518e, where only
> the dev_name was suppose
The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a12cc82bf982f518e, where only
the dev_name was supposed to be changed, the mmc order was changed as
well. This caused
