Hi Jon,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> I was performing the test you mentioned in the above thread to reproduce the
> problem. However, I was not able to reproduce the issue. Did you receive any
> confirmation from Dmitry this fixed his issue for oprofile?
No, looks Dmi
Hi Ming,
On 05/16/2012 05:12 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>> +
>> + /*configure CTI0 for pmu irq routing*/
>> + cti_init(&omap4_cti[0], base0, OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0, 6);
>> + cti_unlock(&omap4_cti[0]);
>> + cti_map_trigger(&omap4_
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> +
> + /*configure CTI0 for pmu irq routing*/
> + cti_init(&omap4_cti[0], base0, OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0, 6);
> + cti_unlock(&omap4_cti[0]);
> + cti_map_trigger(&omap4_cti[0], 1, 6, 2);
> +
> + /*configure CTI1 for pmu ir
From: Ming Lei
This patch supports pmu irq routed from CTI, so make pmu/perf working on
OMAP4.
The idea is from Woodruff Richard in the disscussion
about "Oprofile on Pandaboard / Omap4" on pandabo...@googlegroups.com.
Acked-by: Jean Pihet
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
