> Why should Ubuntu, Fedora etc stink up their OSes with Panda-specific
> workarounds? And Panda is not the only device with this issue.
Why should we crap all over the kernel for all these board specific
problems ? Userspace code is at least pageable and generally less
security critical.
So yo
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 20:58 +0800, "Andy Green (林安廸)" wrote:
> On 10/07/12 20:37, the mail apparently from Florian Fainelli included:
>
> Why should Ubuntu, Fedora etc stink up their OSes with Panda-specific
> workarounds? And Panda is not the only device with this issue.
Actually I think you
On 10/07/12 20:37, the mail apparently from Florian Fainelli included:
Hi -
Le jeudi 05 juillet 2012 04:44:33, Andy Green a écrit :
The following series adds some code to generate legal, locally administered
MAC addresses from OMAP4 CPU Die ID fuse data, and then adds a helper at
net/ethernet
Hi,
Le jeudi 05 juillet 2012 04:44:33, Andy Green a écrit :
> The following series adds some code to generate legal, locally administered
> MAC addresses from OMAP4 CPU Die ID fuse data, and then adds a helper at
> net/ethernet taking care of accepting device path / MAC mapping
> registrations and
The following series adds some code to generate legal, locally administered
MAC addresses from OMAP4 CPU Die ID fuse data, and then adds a helper at
net/ethernet taking care of accepting device path / MAC mapping registrations
and running a notifier to enforce the requested MAC when the matching ne
