[PATCH 5/5] [RFC] ARM: timer-sp: Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- This is an RFC, as it depends on "[RFC] clk: Provide dummy of_clk_get_parent_count() for !OF/!CCF". --- arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c b/arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c in

Re: [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] ARM: timer-sp: Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding

On 05/29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > This is an RFC, as it depends on "[RFC] clk: Provide dummy > of_clk_get_parent_count() for !OF/!CCF". > --- > arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch

Re: [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] ARM: timer-sp: Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding

Hi Stephen, On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >> --- >> This is an RFC, as it depends on "[RFC] clk: Provide dummy >> of_clk_get_parent_count() for !OF/!CCF". >> --- >> arch/arm/common/timer-sp.c | 3 ++

Re: [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] ARM: timer-sp: Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding

On 06/04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 05/29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> @@ -234,7 +235,7 @@ static void __init sp804_of_init(struc