Omar,
>> OMAP4 shares one interrupt line for all the mailbox instances.
>> The ISR is handling only the mailbox instance that was registered last.
>
> This shouldn't be needed, request_irq is being called with IRQF_SHARED flag
> and different device ids, so if a message arrives it fires an interr
On 10/14/2010 9:13 PM, Kanigeri, Hari wrote:
OMAP4 shares one interrupt line for all the mailbox instances.
The ISR is handling only the mailbox instance that was registered last.
This shouldn't be needed, request_irq is being called with IRQF_SHARED
flag and different device ids, so if a mess
OMAP4 shares one interrupt line for all the mailbox instances.
The ISR is handling only the mailbox instance that was registered last.
So if both mailbox instances are running at the same time, the first mailbox
that registered wouldn't get the mailbox message. The same issue is present
in Transmit
OMAP4 shares one interrupt line for all the mailbox instances.
The ISR is handling only the mailbox instance that was registered last.
So if both mailbox instances are running at the same time, the first mailbox
that registered wouldn't get the mailbox message. The same issue is present
in Transmit
OMAP4 shares one interrupt line for all the mailbox instances.
The ISR is handling only the mailbox instance that was registered last.
So if both mailbox instances are running at the same time, the first mailbox
that registered wouldn't get the mailbox message. The same issue is present
in Transmit
