On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 07:17 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 07:17 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
> >> >
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:39 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:04 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Guenter Roeck
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:04 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> >> wr
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:04 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver monito
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy wrote:
> > >> On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver m
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 03:24 -0400, Todd Poynor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:07:12PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> ...
> > + temp_sensor->phy_base = ioremap(mem->start, resource_size(mem));
>
> Check NULL return.
>
> temp_sensor->phy_base is never iounmapped in error paths or _remove
> function
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy wrote:
> >> On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver monitors the temperature of
> >> the MPU subsystem of the OMAP4. It
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy wrote:
>> On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver monitors the temperature of
>> the MPU subsystem of the OMAP4. It sends notifications to the user space if
>> the temperature crosses u
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:07:12PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
...
> + temp_sensor->phy_base = ioremap(mem->start, resource_size(mem));
Check NULL return.
temp_sensor->phy_base is never iounmapped in error paths or _remove
function.
...
> +static int __devexit omap_temp_sensor_remove(struct platfo
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Janakiram Sistla
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Janakiram Sistla
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Keerthy,
>> >
>> > Can you please point me the TRM of 4430 or 4460 where it reads the on
>> > die
>> > temp
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Janakiram Sistla
wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> Can you please point me the TRM of 4430 or 4460 where it reads the on die
> temperature sensor used is TMP103. I am referring to public TRM on TI site.
Sorry my bad! I shall remove that.
>
> Regards,
> Sistla.
>
> On Wed
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy wrote:
> On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver monitors the temperature of
> the MPU subsystem of the OMAP4. It sends notifications to the user space if
> the temperature crosses user defined thresholds via kobject_uevent interface.
> The us
On chip temperature sensor driver. The driver monitors the temperature of
the MPU subsystem of the OMAP4. It sends notifications to the user space if
the temperature crosses user defined thresholds via kobject_uevent interface.
The user is allowed to configure the temperature thresholds vis sysfs n
17 matches
Mail list logo