Re: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-09-02 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hello Benoît, Rajendra, Hema, On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 8/9/2010 11:37 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] > > > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:51 PM > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > > > > > > Does it

RE: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-13 Thread Kalliguddi, Hema
Hi, >-Original Message- >From: Cousson, Benoit >Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM >To: Kalliguddi, Hema >Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; >Basak, Partha; Felipe Balbi; Tony Lindgren; Kevin Hilman >Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api c

Re: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-09 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 8/9/2010 11:37 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:51 PM (cc Benoît) On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: Does it make sense for the framework itself to enable wakeup for all devices when the slave port is programm

Re: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-09 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 8/6/2010 7:28 PM, Kalliguddi, Hema wrote: From: Hema HK Omap USBOTG modules has a requirement to set the auto idle bit only after setting smart idle bit. Is it a requirement or an errata? Could you provide more information (i.e. TRM page or errata number / description)? Modified the _sy

RE: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-09 Thread Nayak, Rajendra
ousson, Benoit; Kevin Hilman > Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes > > (cc Benoît) > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > > Does it make sense for the framework itself to enable wakeup > > for all devices when the slave port is programmed to be

RE: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-09 Thread Paul Walmsley
(cc Benoît) On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > Does it make sense for the framework itself to enable wakeup > for all devices when the slave port is programmed to be in > Smartidle It seems to me that they are separate mechanisms? If a module is programmed for slave smart-idle, then

RE: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-08 Thread Nayak, Rajendra
Basak, Partha; Felipe Balbi; Tony > Lindgren; Kevin Hilman > Subject: [PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes > > From: Hema HK > > Omap USBOTG modules has a requirement to set the auto idle > bit only after > setting smart idle bit. Modified the _sys_enable api to set > t

[PATCH 7/8] : Hwmod api changes

2010-08-06 Thread Hema HK
From: Hema HK Omap USBOTG modules has a requirement to set the auto idle bit only after setting smart idle bit. Modified the _sys_enable api to set the smart idle first and then the autoidle bit. Setting this will not have any impact on the other modules. Added 2 wrapper APIs in the omap devi