On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:05 +0530, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
The patch is now otherwise fine, but I think it needs some more
renaming. Now the code mixes fclk and core-clk names, which is rather
confusing. I
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra cmahapa...@ti.com
---
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:16 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:01 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:43 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra cmahapa...@ti.com
---
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:01 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:43 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
