On Monday 28 April 2014 01:10 PM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
There have been various patches floating around for enabling
the SDIO IRQ for hsmmc, but none of them ever got merged.
Probably the reason for not merging the SDIO interrupt patches
has been the lack of wake-up path for SDIO on some omaps
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart afenk...@gmail.com wrote:
@@ -2201,11 +2346,16 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(host-dev);
if (!(host-mmc-pm_flags MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER)) {
- omap_hsmmc_disable_irq(host);
+
Hi Andreas,
2014-04-30 14:23 GMT+02:00 Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart afenk...@gmail.com wrote:
@@ -2201,11 +2346,16 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(host-dev);
if
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart afenk...@gmail.com wrote:
There have been various patches floating around for enabling
the SDIO IRQ for hsmmc, but none of them ever got merged.
Probably the reason for not merging the SDIO interrupt patches
has been the lack of wake-up path
Minor nit...
On 04/28/2014 02:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
[..]
/* Do not initialize card-specific things if the power is off */
if (host-power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
@@ -1117,8 +1138,12 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_hsmmc_irq(int irq, void
*dev_id)
int status;
Minor nit...
On 04/28/2014 02:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
[..]
/* Do not initialize card-specific things if the power is off */
if (host-power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
@@ -1117,8 +1138,12 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_hsmmc_irq(int irq, void
*dev_id)
int status;
There have been various patches floating around for enabling
the SDIO IRQ for hsmmc, but none of them ever got merged.
Probably the reason for not merging the SDIO interrupt patches
has been the lack of wake-up path for SDIO on some omaps that
has also needed remuxing the SDIO DAT1 line to a GPIO
