On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
I have hosted the series at [3].
[3] https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this
branch into the linux-next tree, so we can get some
rotation of this
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
I have hosted the series at [3].
[3] https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
I have hosted the series at [3].
[3]
https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to
Hi Suman,
I'll send new version of patch 11 taking into account Mark Rutland's
comments.
Regards,
Loic
On 02/13/2013 05:41 PM, Anna, Suman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Annas-a...@ti.com wrote:
I have hosted
Hi,
Please find below the updated patch series for mailbox framework creation.
After commit e8d3d47 (ARM: OMAP2+: Drop plat/cpu.h for omap2plus), the
cpu_is_xxx() checks for OMAP are restricted to arch/arm/mach-omap2. The
series includes 4 new patches, first patch removes these earch specific
