Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] i2c: omap: split out [XR]DR and [XR]RDY

2012-07-02 Thread Shubhrajyoti
On Monday 02 July 2012 05:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> + num_bytes = dev->fifo_size; >> > In case of a draining interrupt. The byte count may not be the fifo size. >> > Do you agree? > hmm... indeed, that should be dev->buf_len... can you fix that up or > want me to rese

Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] i2c: omap: split out [XR]DR and [XR]RDY

2012-07-02 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:11:30PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote: > Hi Felipe, > On Thursday 14 June 2012 09:54 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > } > > > > - if (stat & (OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR)) { > > + if (stat & O

Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] i2c: omap: split out [XR]DR and [XR]RDY

2012-06-26 Thread Shubhrajyoti
Hi Felipe, On Thursday 14 June 2012 09:54 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > - if (stat & (OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR)) { > + if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR) { > u8 num_bytes = 1; > >

[PATCH v2 05/17] i2c: omap: split out [XR]DR and [XR]RDY

2012-06-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
While they do pretty much the same thing, there are a few peculiarities. Specially WRT erratas, it's best to split those out and re-factor the read/write loop to another function which both cases call. This last part will be done on another patch. While at that, also avoid an unncessary register