On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:44:13, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com [120213 07:36]:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 19:54:05, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Afzal == Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com writes:
Afzal From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
Afzal Update SRAM
* Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com [120213 07:36]:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 19:54:05, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Afzal == Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com writes:
Afzal From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
Afzal Update SRAM start size for am33xx SoC's.
This is a really awkward
Afzal == Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com writes:
Afzal From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
Afzal Update SRAM start size for am33xx SoC's.
Afzal Note: cpu_is_34xx() is true for am33xx also. Doing
Afzal cpu_is_am33xx() check after cpu_is_34xx() will not
Afzal achieve what we want due to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 19:54:05, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Afzal == Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com writes:
Afzal From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
Afzal Update SRAM start size for am33xx SoC's.
This is a really awkward quoting style :|
I don't particular know the omap sram stuff,
From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
Update SRAM start size for am33xx SoC's.
Note: cpu_is_34xx() is true for am33xx also. Doing
cpu_is_am33xx() check after cpu_is_34xx() will not
achieve what we want due to the above reason.
Hence cpu_is_am33xx() is done before cpu_is_34xx()