On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Applied both and added stable-tag to the second patch. I'll send the
> pull-request when you guys also send me the correct fix for the
> outstanding initialization order issue on OMAP.
It's out, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > I guess these patches are 3.3 material?
>
> Yes.
>
> > How about tagging them for stable too?
>
> Good point. But it's only relevant for this 2nd patch (the NULL
> pointer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > I guess these patches are 3.3 material?
>
> Yes.
>
> > How about tagging them for stable too?
>
> Good point. But it's only relevant for this 2nd patch (the NULL
> pointer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> I guess these patches are 3.3 material?
Yes.
> How about tagging them for stable too?
Good point. But it's only relevant for this 2nd patch (the NULL
pointer dereference fix), as the first one is a 3.3 regression. Let me
know if you want me
I guess these patches are 3.3 material? How about tagging them for
stable too?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Fix this:
>
> root@omap4430-panda:~# cat /debug/iommu/ducati/mem
> [ 62.725708] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> addre
>
Fix this:
root@omap4430-panda:~# cat /debug/iommu/ducati/mem
[ 62.725708] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual addre
ss 001c
[ 62.725708] pgd = e624
[ 62.737091] [001c] *pgd=a7168831, *pte=, *ppte=
[ 62.743682] Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1
