On Wednesday 23 April 2014 03:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2014 14:32:54 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX
>> -static const char *dra7xx_boards_compat[] __initdata = {
>> +static const char *dra74x_boards_compat[] __initconst = {
>> + "ti,dra74x",
>>
On Wednesday 23 April 2014 14:32:54 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX
> -static const char *dra7xx_boards_compat[] __initdata = {
> +static const char *dra74x_boards_compat[] __initconst = {
> + "ti,dra74x",
> "ti,dra7xx",
> "ti,dra7",
> NULL,
> };
The only difference from the dra74x devices is the missing .smp entry.
While at it, also fix the use of __initdata (across the file) and replace them
with __initconst as reported by checkpatch
ERROR: Use of const init definition must use __initconst
+static const char *dra72x_boards_compat[] __in
