On 16/05/2011 10:08, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:17 +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On 16/05/2011 10:08, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk
wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
The names of the regulators also
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
The names of the regulators also changed.
The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well.
Since V1
Use the
