it makes no sense to mark our IRQ handler inline
since it's passed as a function pointer when
enabling the IRQ line.
Tested-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajy...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index bdfd019..ba22247 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void serial_omap_rdi(struct uart_omap_port *up,
unsigned int lsr)
* @irq: uart port irq number
* @dev_id: uart port info
*/
-static inline irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+static irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct uart_omap_port *up = dev_id;
struct tty_struct *tty = up->port.state->port.tty;
--
1.7.12.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
